Pakistani military decries NATO air attack as deliberate

Giới quân sự Pakistan lên án vụ không kích của NATO là có chủ tâm

Pakistani military decries NATO air attack as deliberate

Pakistani Major-General (thiếu tướng) Ishfaq Nadeem told the press  (tuyên bố trước báo chí) on Wednesday that the NATO air attack Tuesday that killed 24 soldiers was deliberate (là cố ý, có chủ tâm), and that it was “impossible” that (không thể nào có chuyện rằng) NATO did not know the targets were Pakistani posts

|GLOSSARY GRAMMAR ISSUE
cross-border: that was done or carried out on the other side of a border of a country, and thus violates the international law regarding sovereignty of the other country
blatant: done without conceal, given to vehement outcry
outcry: la ó, phản đối
vehemnent: kịch liệt
were alerted: được cảnh báo, được thông báo rõ
map references: tham chiếu đồ bản, tham khảo bản đồ
given to vehement outcry: mặc cho mọi sự phản đối kịch liệt
director general: chief executive of an organization, tổng chỉ huy
quote smb as saying smth: eg.> The News quoted Nadeem as saying in the briefing held at army headquarters on Tuesday. trích dẫn ai nói, phát biểu gì
hardening Pakistan’s stance: khiến cho lập trường của ai trở nên cứng rắn hơn
sweats: mồ hôi, công sức
hurt efforts to: damage sweats to
ally oneself with smb. eg.> Islamabad allied itself with Washington in 2001 in the war on militancy

REUTERS – A senior Pakistani army official has said a NATO cross-border air attack that killed 24 soldiers was a deliberate, blatant act of aggression (hành động xâm lược trắng trợn), hardening Pakistan’s stance on an incident which could hurt efforts to stabilise Afghanistan.

In a briefing to editors carried in local newspapers on Wednesday, Major-General Ishfaq Nadeem, director general of military operations, also said NATO forces were alerted they were attacking Pakistani posts, but helicopters kept firing.

“Detailed information of the posts was already with (đã được gửi cho) ISAF (International Security Assistance Force), including map references, and it was impossible that they did not know these to be our posts,” The News quoted Nadeem as saying in the briefing held at army headquarters on Tuesday.

NATO helicopters and fighter jets attacked two military border posts in northwest Pakistan on Saturday in the worst incident of its kind since Islamabad allied itself with Washington in 2001 in the war on militancy (cuộc chiến chống lại quân nổi dậy).

The helicopters appeared near the post around 15 to 20 minutes past midnight, opened fire, then left about 45 minutes later, Nadeem was quoted as saying. They reappeared at 0115 local time and attacked again for another hour, he said.

Nadeem said that minutes before the first attack, a U.S. sergeant on duty (đang trực) at a communications centre in Afghanistan told a Pakistani major that NATO special forces were receiving indirect fire from a location 15 km (9 miles) from the posts.

The Pakistanis said they needed time to check and asked for coordinates. Seven minutes later, the sergeant (trung sĩ) called back and said “your Volcano post has been hit”, Nadeem quoted the sergeant as saying.

Nadeem concluded that the communication confirmed NATO knew the locations of the Pakistani posts before attacking, said The News.

Reinvigorated military

The NATO attack shifted attention away from Pakistan’s widely questioned performance against militants who cross its border to attack U.S.-led NATO forces (lực lượng NATO do Mỹ chỉ huy) in Afghanistan, and has given the military a chance to reassert itself (tái xác nhận vị thế của mình) 

On Tuesday, Pakistan pulled out of an international conference on Afghanistan, an angry riposte (trả đủa, phản ứng lại) after the attack by NATO plunged the region deeper into crisis. (đẩy, xô đẩy .. rơi vào tình hình khủng hoảng nghiêm trọng hơn nữa) 

Islamabad’s decision to boycott (tẩy chay) next week’s meeting in Bonn, Germany, will deprive the talks of a key player that could nudge  (húych, đẩy, thuyết phục) Taliban militants into a peace process as NATO combat troops prepare to leave Afghanistan in 2014.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday she regretted Pakistan’s decision to boycott next week’s international conference on Afghanistan but hoped to secure (có được) Islamabad’s cooperation in future.

“Nothing will be gained by turning our backs on mutually beneficial cooperation. Frankly it is regrettable that Pakistan has decided not to attend the conference in Bonn,” Clinton told a news conference in South Korea.

The army, which has ruled the country for more than half of its history and sets security and foreign policy, faced strong criticism from both the Pakistani public and its ally, the United States, after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The al Qaeda leader had apparently been living in a Pakistani garrison town () for years before U.S. special forces found and killed him in a unilateral raid.

Pakistanis criticised the military for failing to protect their sovereignty, and angry U.S. officials wondered whether some members of military intelligence had sheltered (bảo bọc, che chở) him.

Pakistan’s government and military said they had no idea (không hề biết) bin Laden was in the country.

The army seems to have regained its confidence, and anti-NATO protests suggest it has won the support of the public  (được sự ủng hộ của quần chúng) in a country where anti-American sentiment runs high (lên cao) even on rare occasions when relations with Washington are healthy (lành mạnh, tốt đẹp).

Exactly what happened at the Pakistani posts along an unruly and poorly defined border is still unclear. NATO has promised to investigate.

A Western official and an Afghan security official who requested anonymity said NATO troops were responding to fire from across the border. Pakistan said earlier the attack was unprovoked.  (đã xảy ra mà không hề có sự khiêu khích)

Both the Western and Pakistani explanations are possibly correct: that a retaliatory attack by NATO troops took a tragic, mistaken turn in harsh terrain where differentiating friend from foe can be difficult.

Nadeem was adamant (kiên quyết) that all communications channels had informed NATO that it was attacking Pakistani positions.

“They continued regardless, with impunity,” The News quoted him as saying

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: